Contesting revisionism : China, the United States, and the transformation of international order / Steve Chan, Huiyun Feng, Kai He, and Weixing Hu.

By: Chan, Steve [author.].
Contributor(s): Feng, Huiyun, 1971- [author.] | He, Kai [author.] | Hu, Weixing (Researcher on world politics) [author.].
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: New York : Oxford University Press, [2021&#x5dCopyright date: �2021Description: 1 online resource (viii, 223 pages).Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780197580332; 0197580335; 9780197580318; 0197580319; 0197580327; 9780197580325.Call No.: JZ1242 .C444 2021 Other title: China, the United States, and the transformation of international order.Subject(s): International relations | United States -- Foreign relations -- China | China -- Foreign relations -- United States | Unipolarity (International relations) | International relations | Unipolarity (International relations) | China | United StatesGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Contesting revisionismDDC classification: 327.51073 Online resources: EBSCOhost
Contents:
Basic Rationale and Arguments -- The Origin and Evolution of Revisionism -- Meaning of International Order and Evidence on Revisionism -- Revisionist States' Strategies and Encounters with their Counterparts -- A Peaceful Transition of International Order?
Bibliography, etc. Note: Includes bibliographical references and index.Local Note(s): WorldCat record variable field(s) change: 650, 651Summary: "What motivates states to act the way they do? This book focuses on a particular kind of motivation inclining a state to challenge the existing norms, rules, and institutions of international order. Specifically, it addresses the concept of revisionism which has loomed large in international relations narratives but has remained largely understudied until recently. The authors offer a critique of the existing discourse on revisionism and investigate the historical origin and evolution of the foreign policy orientations of revisionist states in the past. They moreover introduce an ensemble of indicators to discern and compare the extent of revisionist tendencies on the part of contemporary China and the U.S. Questioning the facile assumption that past episodes will repeat in the future, they argue that "hard" revisionism relying on war and conquest is less viable and likely in today's world. Instead, "soft" revisionism seeking to promote institutional change is more relevant and likely. They attend especially to contemporary Sino-American relations and conclude that much of the current discourse based on power transition theory is problematic. Contrary to this theory, a dominant power is not inevitably committed to the defense of international order, nor does a rising power usually have a revisionist agenda to challenge this order. The transformation of international order does not necessarily require a power transition between China and the U.S., nor does a possible power transition between these two countries necessarily augur war"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Basic Rationale and Arguments -- The Origin and Evolution of Revisionism -- Meaning of International Order and Evidence on Revisionism -- Revisionist States' Strategies and Encounters with their Counterparts -- A Peaceful Transition of International Order?

"What motivates states to act the way they do? This book focuses on a particular kind of motivation inclining a state to challenge the existing norms, rules, and institutions of international order. Specifically, it addresses the concept of revisionism which has loomed large in international relations narratives but has remained largely understudied until recently. The authors offer a critique of the existing discourse on revisionism and investigate the historical origin and evolution of the foreign policy orientations of revisionist states in the past. They moreover introduce an ensemble of indicators to discern and compare the extent of revisionist tendencies on the part of contemporary China and the U.S. Questioning the facile assumption that past episodes will repeat in the future, they argue that "hard" revisionism relying on war and conquest is less viable and likely in today's world. Instead, "soft" revisionism seeking to promote institutional change is more relevant and likely. They attend especially to contemporary Sino-American relations and conclude that much of the current discourse based on power transition theory is problematic. Contrary to this theory, a dominant power is not inevitably committed to the defense of international order, nor does a rising power usually have a revisionist agenda to challenge this order. The transformation of international order does not necessarily require a power transition between China and the U.S., nor does a possible power transition between these two countries necessarily augur war"-- Provided by publisher.

Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on June 17, 2021).

WorldCat record variable field(s) change: 650, 651

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer


- Copyright © 2022 Library and Learning Space -

Powered by Koha